What are the chances that rat poison in the pet food supply is just practice for human food poisoning?
Posted by The Pets One in Pet FoodSep 4th, 2009 | 12 responsesBarkley Hound asked:
Could the poison in the pet food supply just be practice to figure out how to get poison into the human food supply?
12 Responses to “What are the chances that rat poison in the pet food supply is just practice for human food poisoning?”
Leave a Reply
About Me
I really.. really.. really.. don’t see the connection here.
Shhhh! They’ll send men tae silence ye!
NOT get over the conspiricy theory
Boy its hard to see this question, because I unfortunately wondered the same thing. We have all become paranoid, but rightly so I guess. Lets hope it was just a horrible mistake.
no, the FDA has to many tests to get a widespread poison to the masses
no. and stop trying to start a crappy urban legend, or more paranoia about the government.
Interesting theory, actually…
Well, you could look at it from another, rather bizarre angle
With the ecoli and such in our spinach or whatever, perhaps WE were the test subjects so they could poison dogs…
Doubt it, but whatever.
But, then, who would be wanting to poison us? Its not like they make money off us dying…if anything they’re sued and lose money… I see no motive unless its for someones sick pleasure.
A “test run” is actually standard practice for covert terrorist attacks. That thought entered my mind as well.
However, I think if it was intentional, the number of pet deaths would be much greater than that. I believe this is probably just the result of sloppy pest control.
And if you really believe the FDA is able to keep a close watch on food consider this: Less than 1% of all food coming in from overseas is inspected.
Really think our food supply is safe from terrorism? Read again:
I read an article about a blackmailer who tried poisoning pet food back in the 80’s in Britian. He poisoned some and sent them to the pet food company and told them to put so much money in an account by a certain date or else he would put the poison stuff on the market. He sent them the sample to let the company know that there were actually poisoned items and that they would be hard to discover. The idea was that if the company did not pay the money the guy wanted, then a few poisoning from that brand would cause everyone to stop buying that brand and would cost the company a lot more than what the guy wanted for blackmail.
The company contacted the police and then they paid the blackmail. The poisoned food was never put on the market. The guy was later caught and when the police searched his place, they found a lot of baby food. It seems the guy was thinking about trying another blackmail like this with poisoned baby food.
When I heard about the poisoned pet food I remembered this story. Now, is this an actual practice to poison humans, I doubt it. There is not even proof that the poisoning is intentional. It is possible that it is accidental. We will have to wait for some more investigation to happen.
Anything’s possible with terrorists ( & liberals ) on the loose .
Not much. Very few pets actually died, due to quick action and publication of the threat. Most of the animal deaths were, in fact, of test animals testing the food, not people’s pets; total deaths about 16. This led to a recall of 60,000,000 cans of pet food. So, you might say the main impact is economic and emotional. It seems to be just the usual poor quality control involved in goods imported from China….
Of course, a smart terrorist might study and learn from the situation.
My husband said the same thing, jokingly. Now that I’ve seen other comments, I wonder……